• nutomic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Interesting, it seems that every project implements groups in wildly different ways. Both bookwyrm and pleroma are going for private groups primarily, with public groups as an afterthought.

      • smallcircles@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yes, it seems to be the only way that fediverse evolves… organically, haphazardly maybe. I don’t know whether that is good or bad, but I find it a bit disheartening to see that it so hard to get a bit of broader collaboration off the ground. The prior discussion on SocialHub on Standardizing ActivityPub Groups (which was a continuation of a much older discussion) has sorta stalled again. Though still the occasional reply seeps in…

    • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      The screenshots look like its essentially facebook groups, which would be nice because im in a lot of facebook meme groups and havent seen any federated alternatives with a UX that i feel i could really pitch to somone deep into instagram / fb / whatsapp land.